4.6 Article

Recovery of Erectile Function After Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy and Penile Rehabilitation With Nightly Intraurethral Alprostadil Versus Sildenafil Citrate

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 183, 期 6, 页码 2451-2456

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.062

关键词

penis; rehabilitation; erectile dysfunction; alprostadil; prostatectomy

资金

  1. Vivus
  2. Pfizer
  3. Med Reviews
  4. American Medical Systems
  5. Auxilium
  6. Coloplast
  7. Cook
  8. GlaxoSmithKline/Schering Plough
  9. Indevus
  10. Johnson Johnson
  11. Medtronic
  12. National Institute of Health
  13. Plethora
  14. Sanofi-Aventis
  15. Solvay
  16. Theralogix
  17. Timm Medical
  18. Augusta Medical
  19. Watson
  20. Aeterna-Zentaris
  21. Steba-Pharma
  22. Serenity
  23. USOHIFU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To our knowledge we report the first large, randomized, prospective penile rehabilitation clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of nightly intraurethral alprostadil vs sildenafil citrate after nerve sparing prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, open label, multicenter American study in men with normal erectile function who underwent bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. The International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain was the primary end point. Subjects initiated nightly treatment within 1 month of surgery with intraurethral alprostadil or oral sildenafil citrate (50 mg) for 9 months. After 1-month washout and before sexual activity subjects self-administered sildenafil citrate (100 mg) for a total of 6 attempts in 1 month. Secondary end points were the global assessment question, sexual encounter profile, Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and measured stretched penile length. Results: Of 139 men who started intraurethral alprostadil and 73 who started sildenafil citrate, 97 and 59, respectively, completed the trial. There were no statistically significant differences in International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain and intercourse success rates to intraurethral alprostadil. The global assessment question was significantly better only at 6 months for intraurethral alprostadil (p <0.028). At completion there were no differences between treatments for any of the end points. Conclusions: This is the first study to directly compare the ability of alprostadil and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor to enhance penile recovery subsequent to bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. The use of nightly subtherapeutic intraurethral alprostadil is well tolerated after radical prostatectomy. The benefit to return of erectile function of nightly sildenafil citrate and subtherapeutic intraurethral alprostadil appears to be comparable within the first year of surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据