4.1 Article

Retinopathy of Prematurity in Bangladeshi Neonates

期刊

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 333-339

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmn035

关键词

neonatal; prematurity; retinopathy of prematurity

资金

  1. Thrasher Research Fund
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. Office of Health, Infectious Diseases and Nutrition, Global Health Bureau, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [HRN-A-00-96-90006-00]
  4. Family Health and Child Survival Cooperative Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a potentially blinding eye disorder that primarily affects premature infants. Increased survival of extremely low birth weight infants following advances in antenatal and neonatal care has resulted in a population of infants at high risk of developing ROP. Long term morbidity of ROP has a spectrum ranging from myopia to blindness. Screening programs and early intervention can provide enormous economic and social benefits. Materials and Methods: Preterm infants of gestational age <33 weeks admitted to the Special Care Nursery of Dhaka Shishu Hospital for a trial of topical emollient therapy during December 1998-July 2003 were followed-up after hospital discharge, including detailed ophthalmologic examination. Detailed history regarding risks during pregnancy, delivery and hospital stay was documented. ROP cases were managed according to the stage of the disease at diagnosis. Results: Five out of the 114 (4.4%) children seen in follow-up were diagnosed with ROP. Low gestational age, low birth weight, administration of oxygen, apneic spells, sepsis and blood transfusions were common factors among cases who developed ROP. Conclusion: As survival of preterm infants in low resource settings increases, ROP will become increasingly important as a potential cause of blindness, emphasizing the critical need for ophthalmologic examination in premature infants, with immediate initiation of treatment when ROP is diagnosed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据