4.1 Article

Morphological characterization of the ovary under normal cycling in rats and its viewpoints of ovarian toxicity detection

期刊

JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 SP189-SP197

出版社

JAPANESE SOC TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.2131/jts.34.S189

关键词

Estrous cycle; Morphology; Ovarian toxicity; Rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of ovarian toxicity is very important for safety assessment of drugs and other environmental chemicals. The detection of interference with ovarian function is very hard without a thorough understanding of the normal ovarian morphology based on reproductive physiology. The focus of the present study was therefore a practical analysis in each stage of the estrous cycles using ovaries obtained from 143 rats demonstrating normal cycling. Transversely dissected maximum areas in the ovaries were examined microscopically for the two major features, follicles and corpora lutea (CL). Classification of growing follicles was in reference to Pedersen and Peters (1968), and functionally divided into follicular stimulating hormone (FSH)-independent and dependent categories. The former, small and medium-sized follicles, respectively primordial/primary and preantral follicles, could be readily detected by immunohistochemical staining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). The large antral and Graafian follicles and large sized atretic follicles showed sequential changes depending on the estrous cycle stage. CL could be divided into currently and previously formed examples. Currently formed CL underwent remarkable changes in their appearance with the cycle, reflecting ovulation and progesterone production. Thus morphological analysis that is synchronized the large antral follicle changes with recently formed CL ones allows the ovary to be classified into the each estrous cycle stage. Morphological deviation from any synchronized combination provides a first pointer of ovarian toxicity. PCNA immunohistochemical staining is also useful to detect small follicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据