4.1 Article

Collaborative work on evaluation of ovarian toxicity 10) Two- or four-week repeated dose studies and fertility study of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in female rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 SP111-SP119

出版社

JAPANESE SOC TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.2131/jts.34.S111

关键词

Ovarian toxicity; di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP); Repeated dose toxicity study; Female fertility study; Rat study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main purpose of this collaborative work is to determine the optimal administration period required to detect toxic effects in evaluation of ovarian morphological changes in repeated-dose toxicity studies. To assess the morphological and functional changes induced in the ovaries by di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), two repeated-dose toxicity studies (repeated dose for 2 or 4 weeks) of DEHP administrated to female rats at dose levels of 0, 300, 1,000 and 3,000 mg/kg were conducted in collaboration with a female fertility study at the same dosages from 2 weeks prior to mating to Day 7 of pregnancy. Histopathology of the ovaries in both repeated-dose toxicity studies showed vacuolation of stromal cells in the groups receiving 300 mg/kg or more and an increase of large atretic follicles in groups at 1,000 mg/kg or more. In the 4-week study, a decrease in new corpora lutea was observed in the 3,000 mg/kg group. In the female fertility study, the 3,000 mg/kg group showed prolongation of the mean estrous cycle and irregular estrous cycles. Cesarean section revealed a decrease of pregnancy rate in the 3,000 mg/kg group. No effects on fertility or early embryonic development were found in groups at 1,000 mg/kg or less. These findings indicate that histopathological changes in the ovary are important endpoints for the evaluation of drugs which induce ovarian damage. In conclusion, for a repeated-dose toxicity study, a 2-week administration period is sufficient to detect ovarian toxicity caused by DEAR

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据