4.6 Article

A Randomized Phase II Trial of First-Line Treatment with Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, or Gemcitabine and Erlotinib in Elderly Patients (Age ≥70 Years) with Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 1569-1577

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182210430

关键词

Quality of life; Cumulative illness rating scale for geriatrics; Targeted therapy; Elderly

资金

  1. Genentech

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Single-agent gemcitabine is a standard of care for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but novel therapies are needed for this patient population. Methods: We performed a noncomparative randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine, erlotinib, or the combination in elderly patients (age >= 70 years) with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer. Patients were randomized to arms: A (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days), B (erlotinib 150 mg daily), or C (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days and erlotinib 100 mg daily). Arms B and C were considered investigational; the primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival. Results: Between March 2006 and May 2010, 146 eligible patients received protocol therapy. The majority of the patients (82%) had stage IV disease, 64% reported adenocarcinoma histology, 90% reported current or previous tobacco use, and 28% had a performance status of 2. The 6-month progression-free survival rate observed in arms A, B, and C was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11-35), 24% (95% CI 13-36), and 25% (95% CI 15-38), respectively; the median overall survival observed was 6.8 months (95% CI 4.8-8.5), 5.8 months (95% CI 3.0-8.3), and 5.6 months (95% CI 3.5-8.4), respectively. The rate of grade >= 3 hematological and nonhematological toxicity observed was similar in all three arms. The best overall health-related quality of life response did not differ between treatment arms. Conclusions: Erlotinib or erlotinib and gemcitabine do not warrant further investigation in an unselected elderly patient population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据