4.6 Article

Randomized multicenter phase II study of larotaxel (XRP9881) in combination with cisplatin or gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in nonirradiable stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 894-901

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31817e6669

关键词

advanced NSCLC; combination chemotherapy; first-line; taxane; larotaxel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: This randomized phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of a new taxane, larotaxel (XRP9881), in combination with either cisplatin or gemcitabine in the first-line treatment of patients with nonirradiable stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer to select the combination having the most promising antitumor activity. Methods: Patients received either larotaxel (50 mg/m(2)) as a 1-hour infusion, followed by a 1-hour infusion of cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)), every 3 weeks (arm A), or gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) as a 30 minute infusion, on days 1 and 8, and larotaxel (60 mg/m(2)) as a 1-hour infusion, on day 8 (following gemcitabine), every 3 weeks (ann 13). The primary end point was the objective response rate (per-protocol Population). Results: Thirty-two patients were randomized to arm A and 30 to arm B. The response rate was higher in arm A compared with arm B in both the per-protocol (26.7% versus 18.2%) and intention-to-treat (28.1% versus 13.3%) populations. In the intention-to-treat population, median progression-free Survival for arm A versus arm B was 4.7 versus 3.3 months and median overall Survival was 8.6 versus 7.3 months, respectively. Fifty percent of patients in arm A and 66.7% in arm B experienced at least one National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 adverse event and grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 46.9% and 41.4% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Both larotaxel combinations were effective and manageable, however all measured efficacy parameters (response rate, progression free survival, and survival) seemed to favor the combination with cisplatin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据