4.4 Article

A quantitative theoretical model for the development of malignancy in ductal carcinoma in situ

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 262, 期 4, 页码 601-613

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.10.031

关键词

Computer simulation; Breast cancer; DCIS; Tumorigenesis; Acid mediated tumor invasion; Hypoxia; pH

资金

  1. CAPES [PROCAD 247/2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mathematical models and clinical observations have demonstrated that microenvironmental hypoxia and acidosis are important selection factors during the later stages of the somatic evolution of breast cancer. The consequent promotion of constitutive upregulation of glycolysis and resistance to acid-induced cellular toxicity is hypothesized to be critical for the ability of cancer cells to invade host tissue. In this work we developed a 3D fixed lattice cellular automata model to study the role of these two phenotypes in determining morphology and the potential for invasion of ductal carcinoma in situ (DICIS), which in this work is defined as the erosion of a healthy epithelial cell layer and direct contact with the basement membrane. The model was conceived as a 40-cell wide epithelial duct surrounded by blood vessels and composed of a basement membrane and one internal layer of epithelial cells. Our results show that an increment in the order of 8-fold in glucose metabolism and an increase in acid resistance corresponding to pH thresholds of approximately 6.8 and 6.45 for quiescence and death, respectively, are required for the tumor to breach through the layer of healthy epithelia] cells and reach the basement membrane as a first step for invasion. Our model also suggests Correlations between classic morphologies and different values of hyperglycolytic and acid-resistant phenotypes, indicating that immunohistochemistry studies targeting these genes may improve the predictive power of morphological analyses of biopsies. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据