4.7 Article

Low-temperature electrochemical performances of LiFePO4 cathode materials for lithium ion batteries

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2014.02.013

关键词

Low-temperature electrochemical performance; Lithium iron phosphate; Cathode materials; Lithium ion batteries

资金

  1. China Southern Power Grid [K-GD2012-394]
  2. technology fund of Dalian City [2010A17GX096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The key factors influencing the low-temperature electrochemical performances of LiFePO4 cathode materials are systematically investigated by measuring and comparing the amount of surface carbon, particle size, and conductivities of LiFePO4, LiFePO4/C and electrolyte in the temperatures range of -20 to 40 degrees C. It is found that the low-temperature electrochemical performance of the material is improved obviously by coating the surface of LiFePO4 with carbon. At -20 degrees C, the discharge specific capacity of LiFePO4/C with 4 wt% surface carbon is 81.4 mAh/g, while the uncoated LiFePO4 only delivers the discharge specific capacity of 27.7 mAh/g. The low-temperature electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C has no significant change as increasing the carbon content, but is further improved by reducing the particle size. In order to understand the difference of low-temperature electrochemical performance between the carbon-coated and uncoated LiFePO4 cathodes, the ionic conductivity of electrolyte, the electronic/ionic conductivities of LiFePO4 and LiFePO4/C at various temperatures were measured. The electronic conductivity of LiFePO4 with 4.9 x 10(-11) S/cm at -20 degrees C is found to be responsible for its poor low-temperature electrochemical performance. However, for the LiFePO4/C, the low-temperature electrochemical performance is mainly determined by its ionic conductivity, therefore, the decrease of the particle size can increase the low-temperature electrochemical performance. (C) 2014 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据