4.5 Article

Transmission of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli between cattle, humans and the environment in pen-urban livestock keeping communities in Morogoro, Tanzania

期刊

PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 477-482

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.12.005

关键词

Urban livestock farming; E. coli; Genetic relatedness; PFGE

资金

  1. Danish International Development Assistance (Danida) [P6-08-TAN]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban and pen-urban livestock farming is expanding world-widely because of increased urbanization and demands for food of animal origin. Such farming practices pose a public health risk as livestock are reservoirs of several zoonotic pathogens. In an attempt to determine the fecal transmission between livestock and people, 100 household clusters keeping cattle in close proximity of humans were selected in urban and pen-urban areas of Morogoro in Tanzania. One hundred eighteen ampicillin and tetracycline resistant Escherichia coli (40 from human stool, 50 from cattle feces, 21 from soil and seven from water samples) were isolated from 44 different clusters. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of Xbal digested chromosomal DNA was used to compare the genetic relatedness of the ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant E. coil isolates. Indistinguishable PFGE band patterns of the ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates were found in samples from 23 (52%) clusters. This suggests that transfer of fecal microorganisms between cattle, humans, water and soils within the farms and from livestock farms to the neighborhood occurred commonly. Logistic regression showed that animal housing infrastructures (Odd Ratio = 11.2, 95% CI = 1.1-119.3) were associated with E. coil showing identical PFGE types within and between clusters. There is a need to improve animal husbandry and manure management practices to reduce risks of transmission of enteropathogens between livestock and humans in urban and pen-urban farming. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据