4.7 Article

Smoking, heavy drinking, and depression among US middle-aged and older adults

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 295-302

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.026

关键词

Smoking; Heavy drinking; Depression; Midlife; Older adult; Health and Retirement Study; Survival analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To examine the relationship between smoking, heavy drinking and depression among U.S. middle-aged and older adults. Method. Individual-level data came from 1992-2012 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. Smoking was ascertained from self-reported cigarette smoking status at the time of interview. Heavy drinking was defined as one or more drinks per day on average or four or more drinks on any occasion in the past three months for women, and two or more drinks per day on average or four or more drinks on any occasion in the past three months for men. Depression was defined as scoring three and above on the eight-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to examine the relationship between smoking, heavy drinking and depression. Results. Compared to non-smokers, smokers free from depression and heavy drinking at baseline were 20% (95% confidence interval: 12-28%) and 34% (20-50%) more likely to develop depression and engage in heavy drinking during follow-up period, respectively. Compared to non-depressed participants, participants with depression who were nonsmokers and non-heavy drinkers at baseline were 41% (14-74%) and 18% (6-31%) more likely to smoke and engage in heavy drinking during follow-up, respectively. Compared to non-heavy drinkers, heavy drinkers who were nonsmokers at baseline were 60% (26-104%) more likely to smoke during follow-up. Conclusion. Health promotion programs in midlife and older age should be mindful of the associations between smoking, heavy drinking and depression in order to improve intervention effectiveness. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据