4.2 Article

Variable presentations of TTR-related familial amyloid polyneuropathy in seventeen patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 119-129

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2011.00331.x

关键词

amyloid; familial amyloid polyneuropathy; transthyretin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autosomal-dominant transthyretin (TTR)-related amyloidosis usually manifests in the second to fourth decade with a length-dependent axonal neuropathy with prominent involvement of the small fibers and multi-organ systemic failure. We retrospectively analyzed seventeen probands, including thirteen apparently isolated cases, carrying eight mutations of TTR gene (age of onset = 60.4 +/- 13.5 years). Thirteen patients were initially un/misdiagnosed; interval from onset to definite diagnosis was 3.3 +/- 2.3 years. Inaugural syndromes were a length-dependent motor-sensory neuropathy in seven cases, a sensory neuropathy in four, an isolated carpal tunnel syndrome in three, a pure dysautonomia in two, and a painful neuropathy in one. Atypical presentations included demyelinating nerve conduction changes with increased cerebrospinal fluid proteins resembling chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and a predominantly motor involvement resembling a motor neuron disorder. Misleading findings also included amyloid-negative abdominal fat aspirate/biopsy, biclonal gammopathy, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) seropositivity. Sural nerve biopsy detected amyloid deposits in thirteen of fifteen patients, including one case with a previous negative biopsy. TTR-immunohistochemistry was necessary to complete the diagnosis of primary amyloidosis light chain in a patient with biclonal gammopathy. A recurrent p. Phe64Leu mutation manifested in the seventh decade with painful motor-sensory polyneuropathy, dysautonomia, bulbar palsies, and fasciculations. TTR should be tested in a wide clinical spectrum of cryptogenetic, progressive, and motor-sensory neuropathies even manifesting with a very late onset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据