4.1 Article

The Impact of Health Literacy on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients With Diabetes Receiving Care in an Inner-City Hospital

期刊

出版社

NATL MED ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30469-7

关键词

diabetes; behavior

资金

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [P01 HSI 0875, R24 HSI 1617]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [5P20RR11104]
  3. AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY [R24HS011617, P01HS010875] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000454] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [R25RR017694, P20RR011104] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is considered to be I of the cornerstones of diabetes self-management. It is unclear whether inadequate health literacy affects SMBG. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between health literacy and SMBG., Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of 189 patients with diabetes, aged 18 to 65 years, receiving care in a large urban, public health care setting. We measured health literacy using the shortened version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. The diabetes care profile was used to determine the use of self-monitoring of blood glucose. Results: Most (60.9%) of the survey participants were assessed as functionally health literate. The majority (90.9%) of the study participants reported testing their blood sugar at least once daily. Although adequate health literacy was associated with recording of blood sugar testing (p = .049), we found no statistically significant relationship between health literacy and the frequency of SMBG. Persons self-reporting having diabetes for more than 10 years were less likely to self-monitor blood glucose (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% Cl, 0.11-0.99). Conclusions: SMBG frequency is not independently associated with health literacy, but SMBG result recording is noted among patients with inadequate literacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据