4.1 Article

Using Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Understand Racial Disparities in Adult Vaccination

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 101, 期 10, 页码 1052-1060

出版社

NATL MED ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)31073-7

关键词

vaccination; men's health; women's health; health disparities

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [5 U01 IP000054-02]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  3. EXPORT Health Project at the Center for Minority Health
  4. University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health
  5. NIH/Nationol Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities [P60 MD-000-207]
  6. Merck Co Inc
  7. Medimmune LLC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: One proposed explanation for the persistence of racial disparities in adult immunizations is that minority patients receive primary care at practices that differ substantively from practices where white patients receive care. This study used both quantitative and qualitative methods to assess physician and practice factors contributing to disparities in a sample of inner-city, urban, and suburban practices in low to moderate income neighborhoods. Methods: Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) and influenza vaccination rates were determined from medical record review in a sample of 2021 elderly (aged >= 65 years) patients. Their physicians were surveyed about office systems for adult immunizations and structured observations of practice physical features, and operations were conducted. Case studies of practices with lowest and highest rates and the largest racial disparities are presented. Results: Overall, weighted PPV vaccination rate was 60%, but rates differed significantly by race (65.8% for whites vs 36.5% for minorities, P < .001 by stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Two of 6 minority panels had PPV rates less than 20%. Overall, weighted influenza vaccination rate, as measured by receipt of the vaccine in 3 of the 5 most recent seasons, was 51.9%, but rates also differed significantly by race (55.6% for whites vs 36.2% for minorities, P < .03, by stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Conclusions: Low rates in 2 minority panels, racial disparity between minorities and whites in mixed panels, and between-panel variation in rates contributed to the overall differences in vaccination rates by race.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据