4.4 Review

Regulation of telomerase and telomeres: Human tumor viruses take control

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm269

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA106258, R01 CA115398] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human tumor viruses are responsible for one-fifth of all cancers worldwide. These viruses have evolved multiple strategies to evade immune defenses and to persist in the host by establishing a latent infection. Proliferation is necessary for pretumor cells to accumulate genetic alterations and to acquire a transformed phenotype. However, each cell division is associated with a progressive shortening of the telomeres, which can suppress tumor development by initiating senescence and irreversible cell cycle arrest. Therefore, the ability of virus-infected cells to circumvent the senescence program is essential for the long-term survival and proliferation of infected cells and the likelihood of transformation. We review the multiple strategies used by human DNA and RNA tumor viruses to subvert telomerase functions during cellular transformation and carcinogenesis. Epstein-Barr virus, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, human papillomavirus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human T-cell leukemia virus-1 each can increase transcription of the telomerase reverse transcriptase. Several viruses appear to mediate cis-activation or enhance epigenetic activation of telomerase transcription. Epstein-Barr virus and human papillomavirus have each developed posttranscriptional mechanisms to regulate the telomerase protein. Finally, some tumor virus proteins can also negatively regulate telomerase transcription or activity. It is likely that, as future studies further expose the strategies used by viruses to deregulate telomerase activity and control of telomere length, novel mechanisms will emerge and underscore the importance of increased telomerase activity in sustaining virus-infected cells and its potential in therapeutic targeting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据