4.4 Article

Priorities for improving the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

期刊

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
卷 100, 期 18, 页码 1282-1289

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn275

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute of the Director
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) office of Rare Diseases
  3. National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Biology
  4. Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A National Cancer Institute summit meeting on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors was held in September 2007 to present the currently accepted standards of care for patients with these tumors and to identify areas requiring investigation and development. These tumors are clinically and pathologically heterogeneous, present commonly with obscure symptoms that lead to delays in diagnosis of years, and have an incidence in the United States of 2.5 to 5 cases per 100 000. The 5-year survival rates range between 15% and 95%, depending on the site and extent of disease. This report delineates the main conclusions of the meeting, including the best practice diagnosis and treatment strategies for gastropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and the identification of clinical and scientific areas that are most in need of attention. The most pressing needs were public and physician education, identification of molecular markers for early diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring, improved imaging modalities and molecular prognostication, development of a standardized pathological classification system, and creation of regional centers of expertise with tumor and laboratory data banks. In addition, adequately validated neuroendocrine tumor models and cell lines should be established to investigate the molecular mechanisms involved in the control of their growth and secretion, and to facilitate the development of specific therapies that should be examined in well-designed multicenter studies of defined patient groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据