4.6 Article

New insights into hard phases of CoCrMo metal-on-metal hip replacements

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.013

关键词

CoCrMo alloy; Metal-on-metal; Hip prosthesis; Hard phases; Carbide; Precession electron diffraction

资金

  1. NIH [1RC2AR058993-01]
  2. NSF [CMMI-1030703]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1030703] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microstructural and mechanical properties of the hard phases in CoCrMo prosthetic alloys in both cast and wrought conditions were examined using transmission electron microscopy and nanoindentation. Besides the known carbides of M23C6-type OA = Cr, Mo, Co) and M6C-type which are formed by either eutectic solidification or precipitation, a new mixed-phase hard constituent has been found in the cast alloys, which is composed of similar to 100 nm fine grains. The nanosized grains were identified to be mostly of M23C6 type using nano-beam precession electron diffraction, and the chemical composition varied from grain to grain being either Cr- or Co-rich. In contrast, the carbides within the wrought alloy having the same M23C6 structure were homogeneous, which can be attributed to the repeated heating and deformation steps. Nanoindentation measurements showed that the hardness of the hard phase mixture in the cast specimen was similar to 15.7 GPa, while the M23C6 carbides in the wrought alloy were twice as hard (similar to 30.7 GPa). The origin of the nanostructured hard phase mixture was found to be related to slow cooling during casting. Mixed hard phases were produced at a cooling rate of 0.2 degrees C/s, whereas single phase carbides were formed at a cooling rate of 50 degrees C/s. This is consistent with sluggish kinetics and rationalizes different and partly conflicting microstructural results in the literature, and could be a source of variations in the performance of prosthetic devices in-vivo. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据