4.2 Article

Interstimulus jitter facilitates response control in children with ADHD

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1355617709991305

关键词

Executive function; Childhood; Variability; Attention; Continuous performance test; Noradrenergic; Locus ceruleus

资金

  1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
  2. NIH/NCRR CTSA Program [UL1-RR025005]
  3. [HD-24061]
  4. [R01 NS043480]
  5. [R01 NS047781]
  6. [R01 MH085328]
  7. [K02 NS044850]
  8. [P50 HD 52121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interstimulus Jitter involves randomization of intervals between Successive stimulus events. and call facilitate performance oil go/no-go tests among healthy adults. though its effect in clinical populations is unclear. Children with Attention-deficit-hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) commonly exhibit deficient response control, leading to increased intra-subject variability (ISV), which has been linked to anomalous functioning within frontal Circuits, as well as their interaction with posterior default mode regions. We examined effects of interstimulus jitter on response variability in 39 children, ages 9-14 years (25 ADHD. 14 controls). Participants completed 2 computerized go/no-go tests: one with fixed interstimulus interval (ISI) and one with jittered ISI. Repeated Measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant group-by test interaction. Such that introduction of jitter produced a significant decrease in ISV among children with ADHD. but not among controls. Whereas children with ADHD were significantly more variable than controls oil the go/no-go test with fixed ISL their performance with jittered ISI was equivalent to that of controls. Jittering stimulus presentation provides a nonpharmacologic mechanism for improving response control in ADHD. This bottom-up approach may be mediated by increases in vigilance through noradrenergic Circuits that facilitate maintenance of frontal Circuits critical to response control. (JINS, 2010, 16, 388-393.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据