4.1 Article

Acyl Homoserine Lactone Production of Brewery Process Surface Bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF BREWING
卷 117, 期 2, 页码 182-187

出版社

INST BREWING
DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00458.x

关键词

Acyl homoserine lactones; Agrobacterium tumefaciens NTLR4; brewery; Chromobacterium violaceum CV026; microbial attachment; quorum sensing

资金

  1. Panimolaboratorio - Bryggerilaboratorium Ltd
  2. Hartwall Ltd
  3. Olvi Plc
  4. Sinebrychoff Ltd
  5. Beneq Ltd
  6. Biocid Ltd
  7. Diversey Inc
  8. Millidyne Ltd
  9. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (Tekes)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to find out whether the first bacterial colonizers of brewery process surfaces after washing produce acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) quorum sensing signalling molecules. Microbial attachment and biofilm formation was studied by mounting sterile uncoated and coated stainless steel coupons onto critical places of the filling machines in three breweries. In the present study 26 previously deposited bacterial strains, as well as approximately 2,300 colonies from 76 process surface samples, were screened using reporter bacteria Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens NTLR4. AHL-producing bacteria were detected both from process samples and among the previous isolates. From the process samples, up to 15% of the screened colonies produced AHL molecules. Production of long chain AHLs was more common than short chain AHLs. The identified AHL-producing isolates belonged to the genera Pseudomonas, Serratia, Hafnia, Rahnella, Enterobacter and Aeromonas, which all belong to commonly found primary colonizers of brewery process surfaces. The same microbial genera producing AHL molecules were found from different breweries. Brewery filling equipment is susceptible to microbial attachment and accumulation on surfaces. In the future, inhibition of quorum sensing could be one additional way of controlling biofilm formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据