4.7 Article

Preparation and degradation of chitosan-poly(p-dioxanone)/silk fibroin porous conduits

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 46-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.05.004

关键词

Chitosan copolymer; Silk fibroin; Porous conduit; Compressive strength; Degradation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81371705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan-poly(p-dioxanone) (CH-PDO) copolymers with various poly(p-dioxanone) (PDO) percentages changing from around 20 to 70 wt% were synthesized. The selected CH-PDO with the PDO content of around 45 wt% was blended with prescribed amounts of silk fibroin (SF) to build porous conduits that are potentially suitable for the applications in long-gap nerve repair. Some conduits were further crosslinked using genipin to-ensure their required compressive strength and proper degradation rate. By optimizing processing conditions, crosslinked CH-PDO/SF conduits had an average porosity of around 70% in their porous wall, and the pore-size in the conduit wall presented a radial change within a region varying from around 10 to ca.100 mu m. After being exposed to PBS degradation system for various periods up to 10 weeks, the weight loss of crosslinked conduits was less than 8 wt% and the pH of degradation media showed a small positive deviation from their initial pH of 7.4. After 10-week implantation in rabbits, most optimally crosslinked CH-PDO/SF conduits were able to maintain regularly tubal shape with a small decrease in their length and diameter and their in vivo degradation rate was predominately controlled by crosslinking and synergetically regulated by the content of SF and PDO in the conduits; and in addition, they showed well-defined ability to retain the compressive strength at a retention rate higher than 70% in comparison to their original strength in wet state. These results suggest that these newly developed CH-PDO/silk fibroin conduits have promising potential for long-gap nerve repair. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据