4.7 Article

Acoustic characterization and microstructure of high zirconia electrofused refractories

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 29, 期 16, 页码 3355-3362

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.07.017

关键词

ZrO2; Refractories; Damage behaviour; Non-destructive evaluation

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new line of electrofused refractory materials with a very high content of zirconia (HZ) has been developed to satisfy the needs of new generation manufacturing glass furnaces. Such materials are subjected to severe operating conditions (temperature and corrosion) during their manufacturing and service life. These HZ materials required very high temperature casting and a suitable annealing process to prevent defects and cracks during manufacturing. Therefore, a research program has been launched to build numerical tools able to predict the thermo-mechanical behaviour of these materials during one of the most critical phases of manufacturing: the controlled cooling of the refractory blocks after melting and casting. The efficient development of such a tool requires the knowledge of thermo-mechanical properties of these materials with temperature, in conditions close to that occurring during processing. In the framework of this approach, the present paper deals with the characterization of elastic properties of two HZ materials, using two mechanical testing devices i.e. a pulse echography technique and a tensile test device. An innovative acoustic emission device is also used to help in identification of microdamage occurrence. The goal of this study is to investigate the microstructure organisation of materials at very fine scale (<100 mu m) in order to correlate the obtained results with the macroscopic properties of the material. Characterisations are also performed at intermediate temperature to establish correlations with the manufacturing process. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据