4.7 Article

Incorporation of wastes from granite rock cutting and polishing industries to produce roof tiles

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 23-30

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.05.045

关键词

Recycling; Sludge; Granite; Roof tiles; Waste materials

资金

  1. CICECO
  2. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/27013/2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work aimed at studying the incorporation of wastes from natural rock cutting and polishing to produce roof tiles. The sintered products incorporating the sludge were targeted to have similar or even enhanced properties in comparison to those made of a standard reference paste industrially used to fabricate concurrent products available in the market. Firstly, the raw materials, including the sludge, were characterised by particle size distribution, density, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal properties and loss on ignition. Different formulations were prepared to evaluate the effects of each component on plasticity of pastes, drying and firing processes, and on the final properties of the tiles. Finally, the most promising formulations were selected and characterised for sintered density, water absorption, and flexural bending strength. The results obtained made it possible to conclude about the possibility of producing roof tiles incorporating 10% of granite wastes having excellent properties (water absorption <6%, lower pyroplastic deformation index, and bending strength values of about 14 MPa and 38 MPa for the green and sintered products, respectively). Therefore, the sludge derived from the granite cutting and polishing industries can be classified as a by-product suitable to replace natural non-plastic raw material in traditional ceramic formulations. This will contribute to preserve non-renewable natural resources, while it allows minimization of the negative environmental impact due to its disposal. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据