4.7 Article

A new thieno-isoindigo derivative-based D-A polymer with very low bandgap for high-performance ambipolar organic thin-film transistors

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 6, 期 21, 页码 3970-3978

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5py00161g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21204017, 51203039, 21174036]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2012CB723406]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0839]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new thieno-isoindigo derivative, bis(5-oxothieno[3,2-b]pyrrole-6-ylidene)benzodifurandione (BTPBF) was synthesized by replacing the outer benzene ring of the isoindigo derivative (BIBDF) with thiophene. This was used for the first time as an acceptor to construct a donor-acceptor polymer (PBTPBF-BT) for organic thin-film transistors. The thermal stability, photophysical-, and electrochemical properties, microstructure, and transistor characteristics were also investigated. Compared to the isoindigo derivative-based polymer PBIBDF-BT, the thieno-isoindigo derivative-based polymer PBTPBF-BT had a much smaller bandgap (0.71 eV), a similar deep LUMO level, (-3.94 eV) and a higher HOMO level (-5.18 eV). Therefore, when Au metal was used as the electrode and the devices were tested under similar vacuum conditions, PBIBDF-BT exhibited n-type transport, whereas PBTPBF-BT exhibited ambipolar transport due to the deep LUMO and suitable HOMO levels. Highest mobilities of 0.45 and 0.22 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) were obtained for hole and electron, respectively. Under the air condition, the hole mobility of PBTPBF-BT significantly increased to 0.61 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) and electron mobility was maintained at 0.07 cm(2) V-1 s(-1). Overall, this study demonstrates that replacing the outer benzene with thiophene can effectively vary the polymer properties such as bandgap, energy levels and, as a result, tune the transport behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据