4.6 Article

Investigation of a Carbon-Supported Pt Electrode for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in 0.1M KOH Aqueous Solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 161, 期 9, 页码 F861-F867

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0491409jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Estonian target research project [IUT20-13]
  2. Estonian Center of Excellence in Science Project [TK117T]
  3. Estonian Energy Technology Program project [SLOKT10209T]
  4. Materials Technology project [SLOKT12180T]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The carbon-supported Pt nanoclusters (20 wt% metal) electrodes have been tested as oxygen reduction catalysts in 0.1M KOH solutions. The novel non-conventional microporous-mesoporous carbide derived carbon powder, synthesized from molybdenum carbide (Mo2C) at 750 degrees C using the high-temperature chlorination method, has been used as an electrocatalyst support for oxygen electroreduction. For comparison, the corresponding parameters for commercially available VulcanXC72 and (20 wt%) Pt-VulcanXC72 have been obtained. Results of the X-ray diffraction analysis show that the Pt nanoclusters have been deposited mainly as the face-centered cubic (fcc) crystals at both carbon supports. The Pt particles were distributed uniformly on the porous carbon supports, and the average particle size of the Pt nanoclusters at (20 wt%) Pt-C(Mo2C) and at (20 wt%) Pt-VulcanXC72 were 42 and 57 angstrom, respectively. The (20 wt%) Pt-C(Mo2C) catalyst demonstrated higher activity (calculated effective electrochemical surface area A(eff) = 0.485 cm(2)) with high specific surface area S-BET = 1600 m(2) g(-1) toward the oxygen electroreduction reaction at room temperature compared with that for the (20 wt%) Pt-VulcanXC72 (A(eff) = 0.320 cm(2)) with SBET = 180 m(2) g(-1). The four-electron oxygen reduction mechanism has been established for both, i.e., the (20 wt%) Pt-C(Mo2C) and (20 wt%) Pt-VulcanXC72 catalysts based electrodes. (C) 2014 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据