4.6 Article

SURE Estimates for a Heteroscedastic Hierarchical Model

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 107, 期 500, 页码 1465-1479

出版社

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.728154

关键词

Asymptotic optimality; Heteroscedasticity; Shrinkage estimator; Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE)

资金

  1. NIH/NIGMS [R01GM090202]
  2. NSF [DMS-0449204, DMS-1007657]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1007657] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical models are extensively studied and widely used in statistics and many other scientific areas. They provide an effective tool for combining information from similar resources and achieving partial pooling of inference. Since the seminal work by James and Stein (1961) and Stein (1962), shrinkage estimation has become one major focus for hierarchical models. For the homoscedastic normal model, it is well known that shrinkage estimators, especially the James-Stein estimator, have good risk properties. The heteroscedastic model, though more appropriate for practical applications, is less well studied, and it is unclear what types of shrinkage estimators are superior in terms of the risk. We propose in this article a class of shrinkage estimators based on Stein's unbiased estimate of risk (SURE). We study asymptotic properties of various common estimators as the number of means to be estimated grows (p -> infinity). We establish the asymptotic optimality property for the SURE estimators. We then :extend our construction to create a class of semiparametric shrinkage estimators and establish corresponding asymptotic optimality results. We emphasize that though the form of our SURE estimators is partially obtained through a normal model at the sampling level, their optimality properties do not heavily depend on such distributional assumptions. We apply the methods to two real datasets and obtain encouraging results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据