4.6 Article

Parameter Estimation for Differential Equation Models Using a Framework of Measurement Error in Regression Models

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 103, 期 484, 页码 1570-1583

出版社

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1198/016214508000000797

关键词

AIDS; HIV viral dynamics; Local polynomial smoothing; Measurement error models; Nonparametric regression; Ordinary differential equations; Principal differential analysis; Regression calibration; SIMEX

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI055290-02, R01 AI052765-03, R01 AI052765-02, R01 AI055290-01, R01 AI059773, R01 AI055290-06, R01 AI062247, R01 AI052765-01, U01 AI027658, R01 AI055290, R01 AI052765-05, R01 AI055290-04, R01 AI055290-03, R01 AI052765-04, R01 AI055290-05, N01 AI050020, N01AI50020, R01 AI052765] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differential equation (DE) models are widely used in many scientific fields, including engineering, physics, and biomedical sciences. The so-called forward problem, the problem of simulations and predictions of state variables for given parameter values in the DE models. has been extensively studied by mathematicians, physicists, engineers, and other scientists. However, the inverse problem the problem of parameter estimation based on the measurements of output variables, has not been well explored using modern statistical method, although some least squares-based approaches have been proposed and studied. In this article we propose parameter estimation methods for ordinary differential equation (ODE) models based on the local smoothing approach and a pseudo-least squares (PsLS) principle under a framework of measurement error in regression models. The asymptotic properties of the Proposed PsLS estimator are established. We also compare the PsLS method to the corresponding simulation-extrapolation) (SIMEX) method and evaluate their finite-sample performances via simulation studies. We illustrate the proposed approach using an application example from an HIV dynamic study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据