4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Preventing and resolving drug therapy problems by understanding patients' medication experiences

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.10239

关键词

Medication experiences; medication therapy management; drug therapy problems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To provide tools for pharmacists to uncover patients' medication experiences and to discuss strategies that medication therapy management (MTM) pharmacists use to prevent and resolve drug therapy problems rooted in patients' medication experiences. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Health care delivery system in the Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN, area from January to October 2010. Participants: 10 MTM pharmacists. Intervention: Thematic analysis of data from a focus group of MTM pharmacists and an MTM pharmacist's practice diary. Results: Patients' medication experiences were revealed as a foundational aspect of MTM pharmacists' daily practices because they had to take these experiences into consideration to be effective practitioners. According to MTM pharmacists, patients express attitudes toward drug therapy in many different ways, thereby affecting how each patient takes his/her medications. Patients' medication experiences often were at the root of drug therapy problems (DTPs). From MTM pharmacists' examples, we identified DTPs at the root of patients' medication experiences and several strategies used by pharmacists to address patients' needs and concerns regarding medications. MTM pharmacists approached patients in a nonjudgmental way so that patients would feel comfortable sharing their perspectives and goals. After understanding patients' motivations and the basis of their attitudes and decision making, pharmacists could negotiate the process of behavioral change, if needed. Conclusion: If pharmacists understand patients' medication experiences, they may be able to address and resolve DTPs to ultimately improve therapeutic outcomes and reduce adverse events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据