4.8 Article

DNA structural distortions induced by ruthenium-arene anticancer compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 130, 期 33, 页码 10921-10928

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja800194a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organometallic ruthenium(II)-arene (RA) compounds combine a rich structural diversity with the potential to overcome existing chemotherapeutic limitations. In particular, the two classes of compounds [Ru(II)(eta(6)-arene)X(en)] and [Ru(II)(eta(6)-arene)(X)(2)(pta)] (RA-en and RA-pta, respectively; X = leaving group, en = ethylenediamine, pta = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane) have become the focus of recent anticancer research. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that they exhibit promising new activity profiles, for which their interactions with DNA are suspected to be a crucial factor. In the present study, we investigate the binding processes of monofunctional RA-en and bifunctional RA-pta to double-stranded DNA and characterize the resulting structural perturbations by means of ab initio and classical molecular dynamics simulations. We find that both RA complexes bind easily through their ruthenium center to the N7 atom of guanine bases. The high flexibility of DNA allows for fast accommodation of the ruthenium complexes into the major groove. Once bound to the host, however, the two complexes induce different DNA structural distortions. Strain induced in the DNA backbone from RA-en complexation is released by a local break of a Watson-Crick base-pair, consistent with the experimentally observed local denaturation. The bulkier RA-pta, on the other hand, bends the DNA helix toward its major groove, resembling the characteristic DNA distortion induced by the classic anticancer drug cisplatin. The atomistic details of the interactions of RA complexes with DNA gained in the present study shed light on some of the anticancer properties of these compounds and should assist future rational compound design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据