4.6 Article

Imiquimod 2.5% and 3.75% for the treatment of actinic keratoses: Results of two placebo-controlled studies of daily application to the face and balding scalp for two 3-week cycles

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.020

关键词

actinic keratosis; clinical trial; dose optimization; imiquimod

资金

  1. Graceway Pharmaceuticals LLC.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Imiquimod 5% cream is approved as a 16-week regimen for the treatment of actinic keratoses involving a 25-cm(2) area of skin. Objective: We sought to evaluate imiquimod 2.5% and 3.75% creams for short-course treatment of the entire face and scalp. Methods: In two identical studies, adults with 5 to 20 lesions were randomized to placebo, or imiquimod 2.5% or 3.75% cream (1:1:1). Up to two packets (250 mg each) were applied per dose once daily for two 3-week treatment cycles, with a 3-week, no-treatment interval. Efficacy was assessed at 8 weeks posttreatment. Results: In all, 490 subjects were randomized to placebo, or imiquimod 2.5% or 3.75% cream. Median baseline lesion counts for the treatment groups were 9 to 10. Complete and partial clearance rates were 5.5% and 12.8% for placebo, 25.0% and 42.7% for imiquimod 2.5%, and 34.0% and 53.7% for imiquimod 3.75% (P < .001, each imiquimod vs placebo; P = .034, 3.75% vs 2.5% for partial clearance). Median reductions from baseline in lesion count were 23.6%, 66.7%, and 80.0% for the placebo, imiquimod 2.5%, and imiquimod 3.75% groups, respectively (P < .001 each imiquimod vs placebo). There were few treatment-related discontinuations. Temporary treatment interruption (rest) rates were 0%, 17.1%, and 27.2% for the placebo, imiquimod 2.5%, and imiquimod 3.75%, respectively. Limitations: Local effects of imiquimod, including erythema, may have led to investigator and subject bias. Conclusions: Both imiquimod 2.5% and 3.75% creams were more effective dian placebo and had in acceptable safety profile when administered daily as 21 3-week on/off/on regimen. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;62:573-81.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据