4.6 Review

Heterogeneity of Prognostic Studies of 24-Hour Blood Pressure Variability: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126375

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0407-10347]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to mean blood pressure, blood pressure variability is hypothesized to have important prognostic value in evaluating cardiovascular risk. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of blood pressure variability within 24 hours. Using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library to April 2013, we conducted a systematic review of prospective studies of adults, with at least one year follow-up and any day, night or 24-hour blood pressure variability measure as a predictor of one or more of the following outcomes: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all cardiovascular events, stroke and coronary heart disease. We examined how blood pressure variability is defined and how its prognostic use is reported. We analysed relative risks adjusted for covariates including the appropriate mean blood pressure and considered the potential for meta-analysis. Our analysis of methods included 24 studies and analysis of predictions included 16 studies. There were 36 different measures of blood pressure variability and 13 definitions of night-and day-time periods. Median follow-up was 5.5 years (interquartile range 4.2-7.0). Comparing measures of dispersion, coefficient of variation was less well researched than standard deviation. Night dipping based on percentage change was the most researched measure and the only measure for which data could be meaningfully pooled. Night dipping or lower night-time blood pressure was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events. The interpretation and use in clinical practice of 24-hour blood pressure variability, as an important prognostic indicator of cardiovascular events, is hampered by insufficient evidence and divergent methodologies. We recommend greater standardisation of methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Review Peripheral Vascular Disease

Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

J. P. Sheppard, K. L. Tucker, W. J. Davison, R. Stevens, W. Aekplakorn, H. B. Bosworth, A. Bove, K. Earle, M. Godwin, B. B. Green, P. Hebert, C. Heneghan, N. Hill, F. D. R. Hobbs, I. Kantola, S. M. Kerry, A. Leiva, D. J. Magid, J. Mant, K. L. Margolis, B. McKinstry, M. A. McLaughlin, K. McNamara, S. Omboni, O. Ogedegbe, G. Parati, J. Varis, W. J. Verberk, B. J. Wakefield, R. J. McManus

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Validation of clinical prediction models: what does the calibration slope really measure?

Richard J. Stevens, Katrina K. Poppe

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Article Peripheral Vascular Disease

Impact of Changes to National Hypertension Guidelines on Hypertension Management and Outcomes in the United Kingdom

Sarah L. Lay-Flurrie, James P. Sheppard, Richard J. Stevens, Christian Mallen, Carl Heneghan, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Bryan Williams, Jonathan Mant, Richard J. McManus

HYPERTENSION (2020)

Article Primary Health Care

Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension-related workload: an interrupted time series analysis in English primary care

Sarah L. Lay-Flurrie, James P. Sheppard, Richard J. Stevens, Christian Mallen, Carl Heneghan, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Bryan Williams, Jonathan Mant, Richard J. McManus

Summary: The study investigated the impact of NICE guideline changes on hypertension-related consultation rates in general practice, finding a decrease in consultation rates associated with the guideline changes.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2021)

Article Peripheral Vascular Disease

Current prevalence of self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy: the BUMP Survey

Katherine L. Tucker, James Hodgkinson, Hannah M. Wilson, Carole Crawford, Richard Stevens, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Madeleine Dale, Nerys Astbury, Lucy C. Chappell, Richard J. McManus

Summary: Many pregnant women in the UK are choosing to self-monitor their blood pressure, but only half of them may communicate their readings to their antenatal care teams. Those who self-monitor appear to have better knowledge about their blood pressure.

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Long-term health outcomes of people with reduced kidney function in the UK: A modelling study using population health data

Iryna Schlackow, Claire Simons, Jason Oke, Benjamin Feakins, Christopher A. O'Callaghan, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Daniel Lasserson, Richard J. Stevens, Rafael Perera, Borislava Mihaylova

PLOS MEDICINE (2020)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Association between antihypertensive treatment and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis

Ali Albasri, Miriam Hattle, Constantinos Koshiaris, Anna Dunnigan, Ben Paxton, Sarah Emma Fox, Margaret Smith, Lucinda Archer, Brooke Levis, Rupert A. Payne, Richard D. Riley, Nia Roberts, Kym I. E. Snell, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Juliet Usher-Smith, Richard Stevens, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Richard J. McManus, James P. Sheppard

Summary: This study found no evidence of an association between antihypertensive treatment and falls, but did find evidence of an association with mild (hyperkalaemia, hypotension) and severe adverse events (acute kidney injury, syncope). These findings can be used to guide shared decision making between doctors and patients, especially in high-risk patients with previous adverse events or poor renal function.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Design, methods, and reporting of impact studies of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules are suboptimal: a systematic review

Jong-Wook Ban, Mei Sum Chan, Tonny Brian Muthee, Arsenio Paez, Richard Stevens, Rafael Perera

Summary: The study evaluated the design, methods, and reporting of impact studies of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules (CPRs). Most impact studies were found to either use inappropriate study design, have substantial risk of bias, or poorly adhere to reporting guidelines. The quality of methods and reporting did not show significant differences between impact and matched control studies. Users of CPRs should critically assess the evidence of the effectiveness of CPRs.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses

Ting Cai, Lucy Abel, Oliver Langford, Genevieve Monaghan, Jeffrey K. Aronson, Richard J. Stevens, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Constantinos Koshiaris, Richard J. McManus, F. D. Richard Hobbs, James P. Sheppard

Summary: This study aimed to assess the associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, while also examining how these associations varied by type and dosage of statins. The findings suggest that the benefits of statins in preventing cardiovascular disease generally outweigh the risks of adverse events, with little evidence to support tailoring the type or dosage of statins based on safety concerns.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain

Carmen Piernas, Brian Cook, Richard Stevens, Cristina Stewart, Jennifer Hollowell, Peter Scarborough, Susan A. Jebb

Summary: Prominently placing meat-free products in the meat aisle did not reduce sales of meat products effectively, but did increase sales of meat-free alternatives in the longer term.

PLOS MEDICINE (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Spontaneous Reporting to Regulatory Authorities of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines Over Time: The Effect of Publicity

Robin E. Ferner, Richard J. Stevens, Christopher Anton, Jeffrey K. Aronson

Summary: The data from the study shows that fatal adverse reactions to coronavirus vaccines are rare, but there are cases of CVST and thrombosis associated with the vaccines. Most cases were reported after the reaction had been publicized, and only a minority of cases had thrombocytopenia.

DRUG SAFETY (2022)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Effects of a group-based weight management programme on anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial (RCT)

Laura Heath, Susan Jebb, Richard Stevens, Graham Wheeler, Amy Ahern, Emma Boyland, Jason Halford, Paul Aveyard

PLOS ONE (2022)

Article Endocrinology & Metabolism

Association between the month of starting a weight management program and weight change in people at high risk of type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study

Dimitrios A. Koutoukidis, Emma Barron, Richard Stevens, Paul Aveyard, Jonathan Valabhji, Susan A. Jebb

Summary: This study found that people who start a weight management program in January tend to lose more weight compared to those who start at other times of the year, with a difference ranging from 12% to 30%.

OBESITY (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events by age and frailty: A cohort study

James P. K. Sheppard, Constantinos Koshiaris, Richard Stevens, Sarah A. Lay-Flurrie, Amitava Banerjee, Brandon K. A. Bellows, Andrew J. Clegg, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Rupert A. Payne, Subhashisa Swain, Juliet A. Usher-Smith, Richard J. McManus

Summary: This study found that blood pressure-lowering treatment is associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events, particularly in older and frail patients. The analysis suggests that prescribing new treatment in these populations may be just as likely to cause a serious fall as it would prevent a stroke or heart attack.

PLOS MEDICINE (2023)

Article Integrative & Complementary Medicine

Investigating the validity of muscle response testing: Blinding the patient using subliminal visual stimuli

Anne M. Jensen, Richard J. Stevens, Amanda J. Burls

ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE (2020)

暂无数据