4.5 Article

Effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on gene expression profiles of pancreatic cancer cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 145, 期 1, 页码 111-123

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.061

关键词

pancreatic cancer; proteasome inhibitor; oligonucleotide microarray

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Pancreatic cancer remains a highly chemoresistant malignancy. Gemcitabine is a widely used clinical chemotherapeutic agent against locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has been shown to result in enhanced cytotoxicity and apoptosis when used alone or in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Materials and methods. To determine the effect of bortezomib on gene expression profile of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells with different sensitivity to gemcitabine, we used Affymetrix HG U133A 2.0 GeneChip (Santa Clara, CA) and measured changes induced by bortezomib in pancreatic cancer cell lines with high (BxPC-3) and low (PANC-1) sensitivity to gemcitabine, at time points 24 h. Selected genes were subsequently validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results. Forty-four common genes in both PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells were identified as up-regulated (>3-fold) induced by bortezomib analyzed by microarray, which are associated with multiple cytotoxic and cytoprotective effects. Bcl-2 was repressed by bortezomib in both PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells, while no changes induced in either cell by bortezomib were disclosed in all five members of nuclear factor-kappa B family. Other interesting genes related to apoptosis or drug metabolism, such as TP53 and ABCB1 (mdr1), were not found differentially expressed in common. Conclusions. Bortezomib exhibits antitumor effects toward pancreatic cancer in vitro and in vivo. Genes with divergent apoptotic effects are induced by bortezomib, which may become promising targets for pancreatic cancer treatment. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据