4.5 Article

Factors Predicting Survival and Pathological Subtype in Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 110, 期 2, 页码 156-162

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23600

关键词

ampullary adenocarcinoma; intestinal-type; pancreatobiliary type; predictive factor; CA19-9

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan [25462115]
  2. Pancreas Research Foundation of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25462115] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is uncommon. This study aimed to clarify predictors of survival for ampullary adenocarcinoma and to identify characteristics of its two major pathological subtypes. Methods: Medical records were reviewed for 86 patients who underwent curative resection for ampullary adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2012 at 12 principal hospitals in Kagawa, Japan. Results: Resection was most common among 75-79-year-old patients. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year postoperative survival rates for ampullary adenocarcinoma were 90%, 72.3%, and 69.1%, respectively. Preoperative biliary drainage; serum CA19-9 and total bilirubin levels; pathological grade; perineural, vascular, pancreatic, and duodenal invasion; nodal metastasis; UICC-T stage; and pancreatobiliary subtype were predictors of poor survival. An elevated serum CA19-9 level; an elevated total bilirubin level; lymphatic, vascular, perineural, and pancreatic invasion; and advanced overall tumor stage were more common in patients with pancreatobiliary-type tumors than in patients with intestinal-type tumors. Additionally, pathologic subtype analysis showed that each subtype had distinct prognostic factors. Conclusions: Preoperative elevated serum CA19-9 and total bilirubin levels are prognostic factors for ampullary adenocarcinoma, and are both associated with pancreatobiliary-type tumors. Surgeons should be aware of these factors because pancreatobiliary-type adenocarcinoma is aggressively invasive and is associated with poor survival. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据