4.5 Article

Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Induces an Inflammatory Response in Distant Hepatic Metastases but Not in Local Accelerated Outgrowth

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 101, 期 7, 页码 551-556

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21570

关键词

local ablative therapy; inflammation; local recurrence

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [92003534]
  2. Catharijne Stichting [07.019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recently, we have shown in a murine model that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) induces accelerated outgrowth of colorectal micrometastases in the transition zone (TZ) surrounding the ablated lesion. Conversely, RFA also induces an anti-tumor T-cell response that may limit tumor growth at distant sites. Here we have evaluated whether an altered density of inflammatory cells could be observed in the perinecrotic (TZ) metastases compared to hepatic metastases in the distant reference zone (RZ). Methods: RFA-treated tumor-bearing mice (n = 10) were sacrificed. The inflammatory cell density (neutrophils, macrophages, CD4(+) T-cells, and CD8(+) T-cells) of tumors in the TZ (TZ tumors) was compared to that in tumors in the RZ (RZ tumors). Sham-operated, tumor-bearing mice (n = ID) were analyzed simultaneously as controls (sham-treated tumors). Results: In RFA-treated, tumor-bearing mice RZ tumors contained a significantly higher density of neutrophils and CD4(+) T-cells, but not macrophages and CD8(+) T-cells compared to sham-treated tumors. Notably, TZ tumors had a significantly lower density of neutrophils, CD4(+) T-cells, and CD8(+) T-cells, but not macrophages, when compared to RZ tumors. Conclusions: The accelerated perinecrotic tumor outgrowth following RFA is associated with a reduced density of neutrophils and T-cells compared to distant hepatic metastases. This may have implications for local tumor recurrence following RFA. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;101:551-556. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据