4.4 Article

Computational methods for prediction of protein-RNA interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 179, 期 3, 页码 261-268

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.10.001

关键词

RNA; Protein; RNP; Binding site prediction; Macromolecular docking; Structural bioinformatics

资金

  1. Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) [TEAM/2009-4/2]
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW) [POIG.02.03.00-00-003/09]
  3. MNiSW [N N301 035539, N N301 190139]
  4. European Commission (EC FP6, Network of Excellence EURANSET) [LSHG-CT-2005-518238]
  5. German Academic Exchange Service [D/09/42768]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [RNA+P=123D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the molecular mechanism of protein-RNA recognition and complex formation is a major challenge in structural biology. Unfortunately, the experimental determination of protein-RNA complexes by X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) is tedious and difficult. Alternatively, protein-RNA interactions can be predicted by computational methods. Although less accurate than experimental observations, computational predictions can be sufficiently accurate to prompt functional hypotheses and guide experiments, e.g. to identify individual amino acid or nucleotide residues. In this article we review 10 methods for predicting protein-RNA interactions, seven of which predict RNA-binding sites from protein sequences and three from structures. We also developed a meta-predictor that uses the output of top three sequence-based primary predictors to calculate a consensus prediction, which outperforms all the primary predictors. In order to fully cover the software for predicting protein-RNA interactions, we also describe five methods for protein-RNA docking. The article highlights the strengths and shortcomings of existing methods for the prediction of protein-RNA interactions and provides suggestions for their further development. (C) 2011 Esevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据