4.4 Article

A tale of two symmetrons: Rules for construction of icosahedral capsids from trisymmetrons and pentasymmetrons

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 170, 期 1, 页码 109-116

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.12.003

关键词

Icosahedral symmetry; Trisymmetron; Pentasymmetron; Capsomer; Large DNA virus; Virus capsid structure; Triangulation number

资金

  1. NIH [R37 GM-033050, R01 AI-079095]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R56AI079095, P01AI045976] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R37GM033050] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The capsids of large, icosahedral dsDNA viruses are built from well-ordered aggregates of capsomers, known as trisymmetrons and pentasymmetrons, which are centered on the icosahedral 3-fold and 5-fold axes, respectively. We derive the complete set of rules for constructing an icosahedral structure from these symmetrons when the T lattice symmetry is odd and show that there are three classes of solutions, each of which follows from a different relationship between the size of the pentasymmetron and the values of the h and k icosahedral lattice parameters. Together, these three classes account for all possible ways of building an icosahedral structure solely from trisymmetrons and pentasymmetrons. Also, every icosahedral lattice with odd T number has solutions from exactly two of these three classes, with the set of allowed classes dependent on which of the two lattice parameters is odd. For symmetric lattices (if h = k or h = 0), the two solutions yield the same symmetron sizes, but when the lattice parameters are equal (h = k) the solutions can be distinguished by the relative orientations of the symmetrons. We discuss these results in the context of known virus structures and explore the implications for viruses whose structures have not yet been solved. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据