4.4 Article

SEX DIFFERENCES IN RESTING METABOLIC RATE AMONG ATHLETES

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 3008-3014

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002813

关键词

gender; prediction; energy needs; energy expenditure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to compare differences in resting metabolic rate (RMR) between sexes in Division III National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) collegiate athletes and to identify predictors of RMR. Sixty-eight male (M) (age: 20.1 +/- 1.5 years; height: 181.8 +/- 5.9 cm; body mass (BM): 93.7 +/- 16.3 kg; and body fat%: 16.3 +/- 8.6%) and 48 female (F) athletes (age: 19.4 +/- 1.3 years; height: 166.5 +/- 6.0 cm; BM: 63.4 +/- 12.7 kg; and body fat%: 21.5 +/- 6.3%) participated in a single day of testing, which included determination of RMR using indirect calorimetry and air displacement plethysmography to measure fat mass and fatfree mass (FFM). An independent-samples t-test was used to compare differences in body composition and RMR between sexes, and regression analysis was used to identify predictors of RMR. Men had a significantly higher absolute RMR (M: 2,481 +/- 209 vs. F: 1,553 +/- 193 kcals.d(-1); p < 0.001), but when adjusted for BM (M: 25.6 +/- 8.3 vs. F: 25.9 +/- 2.5 kcals.kg(-1) BM per day; p = 0.82) and FFM (M: 31.1 +/- 10.6 vs. F: 33.6 beta 3.8 kcals.kg(-1) FFM per day; p = 0.12), these differences became nonsignificant. Regression analysis indicated that BM in both men (beta = 0.73) and women (beta = 0.88) was the strongest predictor of RMR. The results of the current study indicate minimal differences in RMR between sexes among athletic populations when adjusted for BM and FFM. In the current group of athletes, BM seems to account for the largest variability in RMR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据