4.6 Article

Perception of effort in morning-type cyclists is lower when exercising in the morning

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 917-925

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2013.873139

关键词

circadian rhythm; PER3 variable number tandem repeat polymorphism; chronotype; endurance sport

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  2. University of Cape Town Research Committee
  3. University of Cape Town
  4. Discovery Vitality
  5. South African Medical Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent study found that South African endurance athletes are likely to be morning-types and carry the PER3(5) allele, which has been associated with a preference for mornings. The aim of this study was to measure the response of morning-type cyclists to a standardised bout of exercise performed at different times of the day. Participants ncluded 20 trained male cyclists (age: 39.8 +/- 7.7 years, VO(2)max: 51.0 +/- 7.0 ml center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1), training: 166 +/- 98 km center dot wk(-1)), categorised as morning-types (mean Horne-ostberg score: 68.3 +/- 5.5) and carrying the PER3(5) allele. They completed a 17-min sub-maximal cycling test at 60%, 80% and 90% of maximum heart rate (HRmax) at 06h00, 10h00, 14h00, 18h00 and 22h00. These morning-type cyclists reported higher ratings of perceived exertion when cycling at 60% (P=0.044), 80% (P<0.001) and 90% (P<0.001) of HRmax during the evening (18h00 and 22h00) compared to the other sessions (0600, 10h00 and 14h00). This was despite absolute power output, speed and cadence displaying no time-of-day differences. Thus, morning-type cyclists perceive the same relative intensity workload to be harder in the evening compared to the morning. This may have implications for both training and competition scheduling, and highlights the importance of considering individual chronotype in sports in which diurnal variation may be relevant to training and competition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据