4.0 Review

Neuroprosthetic technology for individuals with spinal cord injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 258-272

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000128

关键词

Spinal cord injuries; Assistive technology; Neural interface; Neuroprosthesis; Brain-computer interface; Electrical stimulation; Epidural stimulation; Central pattern generators; Neurogenic bladder; Paraplegia; Tetraplegia; Rehabilitation

资金

  1. Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs [B6789C, B7143R, RX720]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) [N66001-10-C-4056]
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [F32NS074565]
  4. UPMC Rehabilitation Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in a loss of function and sensation below the level of the lesion. Neuroprosthetic technology has been developed to help restore motor and autonomic functions as well as to provide sensory feedback. Findings: This paper provides an overview of neuroprosthetic technology that aims to address the priorities for functional restoration as defined by individuals with SCI. We describe neuroprostheses that are in various stages of preclinical development, clinical testing, and commercialization including functional electrical stimulators, epidural and intraspinal microstimulation, bladder neuroprosthesis, and cortical stimulation for restoring sensation. We also discuss neural recording technologies that may provide command or feedback signals for neuroprosthetic devices. Conclusion/clinical relevance: Neuroprostheses have begun to address the priorities of individuals with SCI, although there remains room for improvement. In addition to continued technological improvements, closing the loop between the technology and the user may help provide intuitive device control with high levels of performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据