4.1 Article

Flower colour variation in the montane plant Gentiana lutea L. (Gentianaceae) is unrelated to abiotic factors

期刊

PLANT ECOLOGY & DIVERSITY
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 105-112

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2015.1074626

关键词

flower colour variation; Gentiana lutea; G; lutea var; aurantiaca; geographical variation; radiation; rainfall; temperature

资金

  1. Plan Nacional de I + D + I
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CGL2009-08959]
  3. Plan Galego de Investigacion e Crecemento
  4. Conselleria de Educacion e Ordenacion Universitaria
  5. Parga Pondal (European Social Fund) grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Flower colour variation among populations may result from the spatial variation of selective agents. The structure of phenotypic variation informs on the ecological processes related to this variation. Variation in floral traits is mainly attributed to variation in the pollinator fauna, while variation in vegetative traits is usually linked to abiotic factors or herbivores.Aims: We investigated the geographical variation of flower colour (and correlated traits) in Gentiana lutea and the relationship with the variation in abiotic factors.Methods: Phenotypic variation (flower colour, petal length, petal width, stalk length, leaf length, flower number, petal number and number of basal leaves) was assessed in 429 plants of 12 populations located at north-west Iberia. Additionally, we obtained data on the geographical coordinates, elevation, temperature, rainfall and radiation for each population.Results: Populations mostly differed in flower colour, from orange to yellow from west to the east. Abiotic factors were unrelated to variation in either floral or vegetative traits.Conclusions: Phenotypic variation among G. lutea populations does not result from adaptation to environmental factors. Other factors, such as historical events or selective pressure exerted by biotic interactions, might explain the flower colour variation in G. lutea along the Cantabrian Range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据