4.7 Article

Tautochronic centrifugal pendulum vibration absorbers General design and analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 333, 期 3, 页码 711-729

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.09.042

关键词

-

资金

  1. BMW Group
  2. BMW Group Research and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the 1930s, centrifugal pendulum vibration absorbers have been used in rotating and reciprocating machinery for the attenuation of torsional vibrations. A large variety of absorber types were suggested and the design was done by linearization theory until the introduction of the tautochronic bifilar pendulum absorbers. Since then, the performance and dynamic stability of this specific absorber type have been considered in analytical and numerical investigations. Different perturbations, e.g. nonlinear mistuning, were considered in order to optimize the system performance, but the characteristic bifilar design remained unchanged. In this paper, a general approach for the design of tautochronic pendulum vibration absorbers is proposed. As a result, it is possible to deal with a large variety of non-bifilar centrifugal vibration absorber designs which provide application-related optimal performance and resolve some of the existing design limitations. Established analytic predictions that show a satisfactory agreement with numerical as well as experimental investigations for bifilar absorbers are not applicable for the comparison of different tautochronic absorbers. Therefore, the second part of this work shows how to analyze this class of centrifugal vibration absorbers using a Hamiltonian formulation. Successive canonical transformations lead to nonlinear equations in action-angle variables, which are then approximated to first order and analyzed by using the method of averaging. These results provide a basis for the design and analysis of tautochronic bifilar and non-bifilar vibration absorbers. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据