4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Structural, spectroscopic, electrochemical and computational studies of C,C′-diaryl-ortho-carboranes, 1-(4-XC6H4)-2-Ph-1,2-C2B10H10 (X = H, F, OMe, NMe2, NH2, OH and O-)

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 1483-1495

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-008-0686-0

关键词

Carborane; Electrochemistry; Radical anion; DFT

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S80943/01] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of aryl ring substituents X (F, OMe, NMe2, NH2, OH and O-) on the physical and electronic structure of the ortho-carborane cage in a series of C,C'-diaryl-ortho-carboranes, 1-(4-XC6H4)-2-Ph-1,2-C2B10H10 has been investigated by crystallographic, spectroscopic [nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), UV-vis], electrochemical and computational methods. The cage C1-C2 bond lengths in this carborane series show small variations with the electron-donating strength of the substituent X, but there is no evidence of a fully evolved quinoid form within the aryl substituents in the ground state. In the B-11 and C-13 NMR spectra, the 'antipodal' shift at B12, and the C1 shift correlates with the Hammett sigma(p) value of the substituent X. The UV-visible absorption spectra of the cluster compounds show marked differences when compared with the spectra of the analogous substituted benzenes. These spectroscopic differences are attributed to variation in contributions from the cage orbitals to the unoccupied/virtual orbitals involved in the transitions responsible for the observed absorption bands. Electrochemical studies (cyclic and square-wave voltammetry) carried out on the diarylcarborane series reveal that one-electron reduction takes place at the cage in every case with the voltage required for reduction of the cage influenced by the electron-donating strength of the substituent X, affording a series of carborane radicals with formal [2n+3] electron counts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据