4.3 Article

Radius morphology and its effects on rotation with contoured and noncontoured plating of the proximal radius

期刊

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 568-573

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.015

关键词

Proximal radius; morphology; plating; rotation; sagittal bow

资金

  1. North Shore Hospital Orthopaedic Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The radius has a sagittal bow and a coronal bow. Fractures are often treated with volar anterior plating. However, the sagittal bow is often overlooked when plating. This study looks at radial morphology and the effect of plating the proximal radius with straight plates and then contoured plates bowed in the sagittal plane. We report our findings and their effect on forearm rotation. Materials and methods: Morphology was investigated in 14 radii. Attention was paid to the proximal shaft of the radius and its sagittal bow; from this, 6-, 7-, and 8-hole plates were contoured to fit this bow. A simple transverse fracture was then made at the apex of this bow in 23 cadaver arms. Supination and pronation were compared when plating with a straight plate and a contoured plate. Ten cadavers underwent ulna plating at the same level. The effect on rotation of fractures plated in the distal-third shaft was also measured. Results: A significant reduction in rotation was found when a proximal radius fracture was plated with a straight plate compared with a contoured plate: 10.8 degrees, 12.8 degrees, and 21.7 degrees for 6-, 7-, and 8-hole plates, respectively (P < .05). Forearm rotation was decreased further when a longer plate was used. Ulna or distal shaft plating did not reduce rotation. Conclusion: This study has shown a significant sagittal bow of the proximal shaft of the radius. Plating this with contoured plates in the sagittal plane improves rotation when compared with straight plates. Additional ulna plating is not a source of reduced forearm rotation. (c) 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据