4.2 Article

Biochemical and molecular characterization of orange- and tangerine-colored rice calli

期刊

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 193-+

出版社

JAPANESE SOC PLANT CELL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.15.0526a

关键词

Callus; beta-carotene; carotenoid; lycopene; lycopene beta-cyclase; rice

资金

  1. MEXT-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities [S0801025, S1311017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We established an orange (L) and a tangerine (D) colored callus line by repeatedly subculturing rice callus line (N). The L line accumulated lycopene, beta-carotene, and two lycopene isomers, while the D line accumulated much higher concentration of lycopene as well as a lycopene isomer than the L line. Genomic sequencing revealed the presence of SNP that results in the incomplete lycopene beta-cyclase (beta LCY) enzyme in the D line. We analyzed expression levels of carotenoid biosynthetic genes by qRT-PCR. Regarding the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate pathway genes, expression of the gene encoding geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase 1 (GGPS1) was enhanced in both L and D lines as compared to the N line. Regarding the carotenoid pathway genes, the transcript amounts of the genes encoding phytoene synthase 2, phytoene desaturase, and zeta-carotene desaturase, were larger in the L line than in the N line; however, this pattern was not found in the D line. The expression levels of beta LCY and lycopene epsilon-cyclase (epsilon LCY) gene in the D line and epsilon LCY in the L line were lower than in the N line. The transcript amounts of two carotenoid oxygenase genes were decreased both in L and D lines. We concluded that increased expression of GGPS1 and reduced expression of epsilon LCY, beta LCY, and carotenoids oxygenase genes might allow an excess accumulation of carotenoids in L and D lines, and that the mutation in beta LCY is responsible for the conspicuous phenotype in the D line as compared to the L line.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据