4.1 Article

Seismotectonic state of reservoirs inferred from magnitude distributions of fluid-induced seismicity

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 13-25

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-012-9292-9

关键词

Fluid-induced seismicity; Magnitude; Seismogenesis; Geothermal; Hydrocarbon; Pore pressure; Seismic hazard

资金

  1. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluid injections in geothermal reservoirs usually induce small magnitude earthquakes (M < 2). Sometimes, however, earthquakes with larger magnitudes (M similar to 4) occur. Recently, we have shown that under rather general conditions, the probability of an event having a magnitude larger than a given one increases proportionally to the injected fluid mass. The number of earthquakes larger than a given magnitude also depends on the tectonic conditions of an injection site. A convenient parameter for the characterisation of the seismotectonic state of a reservoir location is the seismogenic index Sigma. It combines four, generally unknown, site-specific seismotectonic quantities. Using this index, we comparatively analyse the seismotectonic state of several geothermal as well as non-geothermal reservoir locations. The seismogenic indices of the considered locations are in the range of -10 < Sigma < 0.5. Although the number of reservoirs under examination is limited, we see a clear separation between hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs with respect to the seismotectonic state. In addition to a higher seismogenic index, geothermal reservoir locations are characterised by a lower b value. It means that fluid injections in geothermal reservoirs have a higher probability to induce an earthquake with a significant magnitude. Our formulation provides a basis for estimating expected magnitudes of induced earthquakes. This can potentially be used to avoid the occurrence of large magnitude earthquakes by correspondingly planning fluid injections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据