4.6 Article

Error Forgetting of Bregman Iteration

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
卷 54, 期 2-3, 页码 684-695

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-012-9616-5

关键词

Bregman iteration; Error forgetting; Sparse optimization; l(1) minimization; Piece-wise linear function; Polyhedral function; Augmented Lagrangian method; Method of multipliers

资金

  1. NSF
  2. ONR
  3. DARPA
  4. AFOSR
  5. ARL
  6. ARO
  7. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0748839] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  10. Directorate For Engineering [1028790] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This short article analyzes an interesting property of the Bregman iterative procedure, which is equivalent to the augmented Lagrangian method, for minimizing a convex piece-wise linear function J(x) subject to linear constraints Ax=b. The procedure obtains its solution by solving a sequence of unconstrained subproblems of minimizing , where b (k) is iteratively updated. In practice, the subproblem at each iteration is solved at a relatively low accuracy. Let w (k) denote the error introduced by early stopping a subproblem solver at iteration k. We show that if all w (k) are sufficiently small so that Bregman iteration enters the optimal face, then while on the optimal face, Bregman iteration enjoys an interesting error-forgetting property: the distance between the current point and the optimal solution set X (au) is bounded by ayenw (k+1)-w (k) ayen, independent of the previous errors w (k-1),w (k-2),aEuro broken vertical bar,w (1). This property partially explains why the Bregman iterative procedure works well for sparse optimization and, in particular, for a (1)-minimization. The error-forgetting property is unique to J(x) that is a piece-wise linear function (also known as a polyhedral function), and the results of this article appear to be new to the literature of the augmented Lagrangian method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据