4.6 Article

Regional bone geometry of the tibia in triathletes and stress reactions-An observational study

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 150-154

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.04.004

关键词

Stress fracture; Overuse injury; Tibia; Morphology; Athletic injury

资金

  1. University of Otago Research Grant, Triathlon New Zealand
  2. New Zealand Academy of Sport - South Island

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The association between tibial morphology and tibial stress fractures or tibial stress syndrome was examined in triathletes with an unusually high incidence of these injuries. Design: A cross-sectional study design examined associations between tibial geometry from MRI images and training and injury data between male and female triathletes and between stress fracture (SF) and non-stress fracture (NSF) groups. Methods: Fifteen athletes (7 females, 8 males) aged 17-23 years who were currently able to train and race were recruited from the New Zealand Triathlete Elite Development Squad. Geometric measurements were taken at 5 zones along the tibia using MRI and compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic tibiae subjects. Results: SF tibiae displayed either oedema within the cancellous bone and/or stress fracture on MRI When collapsed across levels, symptomatic tibiae had thicker medial cortices (F-1,F-140 = 9.285, p = 0.003), thicker lateral cortices (F-1,F-140 = 10.129, p = 0.002) and thinner anterior cortices (F-1,F-140 = 14.517, p = 0.000) than NSF tibiae. Only medial cortex thickness in SF tibia was significantly different (F-4,F-140 = 3.358, p = 0.012) at different levels. Follow-up analysis showed that athletes showing oedema within the cancellous bone and/or stress fracture on MRI had, within 2 years of analysis, subsequently taken time off training and racing due a tibial stress fracture. Conclusions: The thinner anterior cortex in SF tibiae is associated with a stress reaction in these triathletes. (C) 2013 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据