4.6 Article

Physical collisions and injury during professional rugby league skills training

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 578-583

出版社

SPORTS MEDICINE AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.03.007

关键词

Contact sport; Team sport; Conditioning; Skill; Microtechnology; Injury incidence; Rugby league

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study described the number and intensity of collisions experienced by professional rugby league players during pre season and in season skills training sessions using microtechnology (e g accelerometers gyroscopes) Short medium, and long recovery periods between matches were accounted for and the incidence of collision injuries sustained in the training environment was also assessed Thirty professional rugby league players (mean +/- SD age 23 6 +/- 3 8 yr) participated in this study The number and intensity of collisions and the incidence of collision injuries were monitored during 117 skills training sessions Over the course of the season an average of 77 collisions occurred per player, per session The average number of mild moderate, and heavy collisions performed by each member of the squad per session was 24 46 and 7 respectively A total of 37 collision injuries were recorded during training over the season equating to an injury incidence of 64 per 10 000 collisions Over half (54 1%) of all collision injuries resulted in no loss of training time and less than 14% of collision injuries resulted in a missed match The greatest number of collisions occurred during training sessions in the weeks with the longest recovery between matches (10 days) The incidence of collision injuries also peaked during the 10 day between match recovery cycle These findings demonstrate that while significant physiological demands are placed on rugby league players as a result of the large number and intensity of physical collisions performed in training these collisions are associated with minimal injury risk (C) 2010 Sports Medicine Australia Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据