4.6 Article

The effect of training status on inter-limb joint stiffness regulation during repeated maximal sprints

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 406-410

出版社

SPORTS MEDICINE AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.12.003

关键词

Stiffness; Fatigue; Stretch-shortening cycle; Biomechanics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of anaerobic fatigue and training status on the joint stiffness (JS) regulation of the lower limbs. Twenty-two subjects participated in this study, with a group of athletes (ATH: n = 11, age: 22.1 +/- 9.9 yrs, ht: 181.9 +/- 6.3 cm, mass: 88.2 +/- 12.7 kg) compared to a group of non-athletes (NON: n = 11, age: 20.9 +/- 2.3 yrs, ht: 177.8 +/- 7.1 cm, mass: 80.9 +/- 22.0 kg). A modified phosphate decrement test, which consisted of eight 35 in timed sprints separated by a 30s active recovery, allowed for inducement of anaerobic fatigue while incorporating measures of sprinting performance and JS. Assessment of JS consisted of a single-legged 2.2 Hz spring-mass hopping protocol, measured for each limb. This test was performed prior to the warm-up and after sprints two, four and six. Data analysis consisted of repeated measures MANOVA comparing groups, limbs and test. Repeated measures ANOVAs were also performed on the sprint times and the magnitude of inter-limb JS difference. For all data analysis the alpha level was set at p < 0.05. Assessment of between limb JS revealed that the ATH group possessed significantly lower inter-limb variation in comparison with the NON group after completion of the first pair of sprints, potentially due to their training status offsetting some of the mechanical and neuromuscular effects of repeated stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) fatigue. This enhanced ability to regulate inter-limb JS, in addition to enhancing performance, may reduce the risk of injury by preserving mechanical efficiency and therefore reducing metabolic cost during SSC contractions. (c) 2007 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据