4.5 Article

Renal Outcome in Patients with Lupus Nephritis Using a Steroid-free Regimen of Monthly Intravenous Cyclophosphamide: A Prospective Observational Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 39, 期 11, 页码 2111-2117

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120537

关键词

LUPUS NEPHRITIS; TREATMENT; CORTICOSTEROIDS; PROGNOSIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV CYC) in combination with high doses of corticosteroids is considered the gold standard of therapy for lupus nephritis (LN). However, the optimal dose of corticosteroids needed has not been defined. We evaluated the efficacy of a monotherapy with IV CYC in patients with a first episode of LN (duration <= 6 months). Methods. Forty patients with LN received IV CYC (12 pulses). Prednisone alone was administered and dose-adjusted to control extrarenal manifestations. Response after 24 months was defined as normalization of creatinine level, inactive urinary sediment, and proteinuria <= 0.2 g/day [complete response (CR)] or <= 0.5 g/day [partial response (PR)]. Results. CR was achieved in 25 (62.5%) and PR in 8 (20%) patients. Mean starting dose of prednisone was 23.9 +/- 23.8 mg/day. In a posthoc analysis, we separately analyzed patients initially treated with prednisone doses >= 20 mg/day (Group A, n = 19) or <20 mg/day (Group B, n = 21). CR was achieved in 52.6% (Group A) versus 71.4% (Group B; p = 0.37); and PR in 26.3% versus 14.3%, respectively (p = 0.58). During longterm followup (10.4 +/- 3.1 yrs), 37.8% experienced a renal flare. Thirty patients (81%) still have normal renal function. Renal outcome was irrespective of initial prednisone doses (p = 0.46, Pearson chi-square test of independence). Conclusion. Our rates of CR and PR and longterm outcomes were comparable with rates after treatment with a combination of IV CYC with high doses of corticosteroids. These data warrant randomized controlled trials evaluating different doses of corticosteroids in LN. (First Release Sept 15 2012; J Rheumatol 2012;39:2111-17; doi:10.3899/jrheum.120537)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据