4.5 Article

Monitoring Methotrexate Toxicity in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 2813-2818

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090482

关键词

JUVENILE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; METHOTREXATE; JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS; SIDE EFFECTS

资金

  1. Shannon Nelson, CRN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine the frequency of laboratory abnormalities with methotrexate (MTX) use in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA); to identify potential risk factors for MTX toxicity requiring medical interventions: and to compare the frequency of liver function abnormalities in patients treated with MTX to those not treated with MTX. Methods. Results Of MTX surveillance laboratory testing (SLT) available in clinical databases were reviewed for 588 children with JIA. Information on demographics, JIA features, and factors previously associated with increased frequency of SLT abnormalities was obtained. Results. Results of SLT performed in at least 4-month intervals were available for 138 JIA patients whose JIA was not treated with MTX, and for 198 JIA patients treated with MTX plus folic acid. On SLT of the MTX-treated patients, there were 44 of 2650 (1.7%) AST tests and 90 of 2647 (3.4%) ALT tests that exceeded 2 times the upper limit of normal (> 2 ULN) in 30 children (15%). AST or ALT tests at > 2 ULN occurred more often with systemic JIA (p = 0.04), macrophage activation syndrome, during infections, in systemic antibiotic use, and after intensifying JIA drug regimens. AST or ALT results at > 2 ULN were as frequent among MTX-treated children as those not treated with MTX. Renal and hematological abnormalities with MTX were uncommon. Conclusion. Liver enzyme abnormalities > 2 ULN are rare in JIA, irrespective of MTX exposure. These data suggest that the adult standard of SLT every 4-8 weeks may not be necessary in children treated with MTX, especially if certain risk factors are absent. (First Release Nov 15 2009; J Rheumatol 2009;36:2813-18; doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090482)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据