4.5 Article

Dose Effects of Corticosteroids on the Development of Osteonecrosis in Rabbits

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 2395-2399

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080324

关键词

OSTEONECROSIS; CORTICOSTEROID; DOSE; ANIMAL MODEL

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and Research [18591665]
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18591665] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The relationship between dose of corticosteroids and the prevalence of osteonecrosis (ON) has not been established. We examined the dose effects of corticosteroids on the development of ON in a rabbit model. Methods. Rabbits were injected once intramuscularly with 1 (12 rabbits), 5 (12 rabbits), 20 (20 rabbits), and 40 (25 rabbits) mg/kg of methylprednisolone acetate (MPSL) into the right gluteus medius muscle. Four weeks after the MPSL injection, the proximal and distal parts of both the femora and humeri were histopathologically examined for the presence of ON. Hematological examinations were performed before and after the corticosteroid injection. Results. In rabbits with 1, 5, 20, and 40 mg/kg MPSL, the incidence of ON was 0, 42%, 70%, and 96%, respectively. The dose of MPSL showed a significant association with the incidence of ON. Histologically, reparative tissues around the ON sites were observed in the rabbits with 5 mg/kg MPSL, but not observed in rabbits with 20 and 40 mg/kg MPSL. On hematological examination, hyperlipidemia and thrombocytopenia were most apparent in the rabbits receiving 40 mg/kg MPSL. Conclusion. The study suggested that the dose of corticosteroids plays an important role in the development of ON in rabbits. The repair process was also found to be influenced by the dose of corticosteroids. Corticosteroid-induced hyperlipidemia and thrombocytopenia seemed to be associated with the incidence of ON. (First Release Oct 1 2008; J Rheumatol 2008;35:2395-9; doi: 10.3899/ jrheum.080324)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据